ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2022
Impact of pharmacist intervention to deprescribe inappropriate aspirin therapy in an outpatient anticoagulation clinic at a community hospital.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient perspectives on atrial fibrillation management and pharmacist roles in outpatient clinics: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Impact of an Anticoagulation Management Service-Led Annual Review on Antiplatelet Use and Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prophylaxis in Ambulatory Patients on Background Direct Oral Anticoagulants.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Cost Avoidance Associated with Aspirin De-Prescribing Among Patients Receiving Warfarin.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study objective: This study describes a pharmacist-led process to identify and discontinue inappropriate aspirin in patients receiving concomitant anticoagulant therapy and to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Setting: The study took place in an outpatient anticoagulation clinic within a small community hospital. Participants: Patients ≥40 years old on indefinite anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism were included. Design: This is a quality improvement initiative. Interventions: Utilizing the electronic medical record and patient interview, use and indication for daily aspirin therapy was confirmed. Prospectively collected patient demographics and past medical history were used to determine appropriateness of aspirin therapy. For patients identified as receiving inappropriate aspirin therapy, a fax was sent to the referring provider recommending aspirin discontinuation. Main outcome measures: To assess the effectiveness of the intervention, outcomes were retrospectively measured. The primary outcome was the percentage of "accepted" recommendations. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence, dosing, and indications for aspirin therapy. Results: Eighty (33 %) of 242 patients were on aspirin. Fifty-two patients with atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism were assessed and aspirin was deemed inappropriate in 22 patients. The provider agreed with deprescribing aspirin therapy in 45 %. The most common dose and indication of aspirin therapy was 81 mg (98 %) and primary prevention (40 %) respectively. Conclusions: In our small practice, pharmacist-led interventions were an effective means to recommend aspirin discontinuation in our identified patients. Further studies are needed to optimize a pharmacist's role and address the long-term effects of deprescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.