ReviewCurrent health sciences journal
Stem Cell Treatments in Preclinical Relevant Stroke Models.
Review in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic role of mesenchymal stem cells in neurogenesis for management of neurological disorders: a scientometric study to an in-depth review.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since stroke has limited treatment options, an active search for new therapeutic approaches is required. Initial excitement of using cell-based therapies to stimulate recovery processes in the ischemic brain turned into a more measured perspective, acknowledging obstacles related to the unfavorable environments associated in part with aging. Given the predominance of stroke in older populations, evaluating the effectiveness of cell therapies in aged brain environments is essential and clinically relevant. Despite a common perception of the aged brain being resistant to regeneration, recent research with neural precursor cells and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells indicates that cell-based therapy can promote plasticity and remodeling in the aged rat brain. However, significant differences in the aged brain compared to the young brain, such as expedited progression of ischemic injury to brain infarction, decreased rate of endogenous neurogenesis, and delayed onset of neurological recovery, must be noted. The effectiveness of cell-based therapies may further be connected to age-related comorbidities such as diabetes or hyperlipidemia, potentially leading to maladaptive or impaired brain remodeling. These age-related factors need careful consideration in the clinical application of restorative therapies for stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.