ArticleCurrent health sciences journal
Should PI-RADS 3 be Subclassified According to ADC Values in the Transition Zone?
Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The premise of this paper starts from the fact that a more precise definition related to the intensity of the lesions on the ADC sequence can lead to a new subclassification of PI-RADS 3 lesions in the transitional zone and to an improvement of the specificity of the PI-RADS classification. The study was retrospective and included only patients who, based on prostate MRI examinations, contained exclusively PI-RADS 3 lesions, without other PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions. The number of cases that meet all these conditions was reduced to 18, where a series of characteristics were noted for each one: PI-RADS 3 lesion area on the ADC sequence, the minimum and average ADC value of the lesion, the average ADC value of the transitional zone outside the lesion, PSA, prostatic volume, PSA density and biopsy result. The average ADC value of the negative lesions was 865(165) m2/sec, and of the positive ones was 869(118) m2/sec, which denies the hypothesis that there could be a value limit ADC to delimit PI-RADS 3 from PI-RADS 2 or 4 in this sample of patients. Furthermore, we reported the average ADC value of each such lesion to the adjacent unchanged transitional zone and obtained a greater difference of 432(163) m2/sec between the negative lesions and their adjacent transitional zone, compared to the difference of 399(127) m2/sec between the positive lesions and their adjacent ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.