Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38559747›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2022

Sex differences in baseline profiles and short-term outcomes in patients undergoing closure of patent foramen ovale.

Areeba Asghar, Ada C Stefanescu Schmidt, Yeva Sahakyan, Eric M Horlick, Lusine Abrahamyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Areeba AsgharFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ada C Stefanescu SchmidtToronto Congenital Cardiac Centre for Adults, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yeva SahakyanToronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eric M HorlickToronto Congenital Cardiac Centre for Adults, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lusine AbrahamyanToronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Although sex differences have been emphasized in stroke and congenital heart disease, there has been limited investigation into their role in patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure for secondary prevention of stroke. We aimed to explore differences by sex in baseline profiles, procedural characteristics, and short-term outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter PFO closure. Methods: Data of adult patients undergoing transcatheter PFO closure at the Toronto General Hospital from 1997 to 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. Baseline information included demographic characteristics, medical history, diagnostic, and procedural information, and periprocedural complications. Post-closure outcomes were captured at index hospitalization and during the first follow-up. Results: From 1031 patients in the cohort sample, 80.7 % underwent closure for cryptogenic stroke and 44.7 % (n = 461) were females. We observed significant sex-related differences in baseline characteristics; females were younger, less likely to have a history of smoking, and less likely to have several cardiovascular risk factors at baseline (p < 0.05). The median time to first follow-up was 89 days for both groups. Recurrent stroke was observed in 0.1 % and TIA observed in 0.4 % of in the 'cryptogenic stroke/TIA' group; in the 'other indications' group, 1.4 % stroke and no TIA were reported. No significant differences were present between sexes. Conclusions: There were no differences in procedural and short-term outcomes between males and females undergoing transcatheter PFO closure, but significant baseline differences in risk factors were identified. There is a critical need for long-term, systematic studies to understand sex and gender differences in the PFO population.

Indexed as

Congenital heart diseasePatent foramen ovalePFOSexTranscatheter PFO closure

Identifiers

PMID38559747
PMCPMC10978392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.