Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38559674›Full record

ArticlePattern recognition2024

Federated learning for medical image analysis: A survey.

Hao Guan, Pew-Thian Yap, Andrea Bozoki, Mingxia Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pattern recognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao GuanDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Pew-Thian YapDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Andrea BozokiDepartment of Neurology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Mingxia LiuDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Funding

Comprehensive MR Fingerprinting for Infants and Young Children at Risk for Developmental Delays.R01HD112923 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Dan Ma, DEANNE E WILSON-COSTELLO · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
Multi-Site Neuroimage Harmonization for Personalized Brain Disorder AnalysisRF1AG073297 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, MINGXIA · 2022 to 2022
$1.4M
AI-Powered MRI Quality Control and Artifact Correction for Multi-Site StudiesR01EB035160 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Pew-Thian Yap · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
Multi-Site Neuroimage Harmonization for Personalized Brain Disorder AnalysisR01AG073297 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Mingxia Liu · 2025 to 2026
$922k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073297NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG073297NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB035160NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD112923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning in medical imaging often faces a fundamental dilemma, namely, the small sample size problem. Many recent studies suggest using multi-domain data pooled from different acquisition sites/centers to improve statistical power. However, medical images from different sites cannot be easily shared to build large datasets for model training due to privacy protection reasons. As a promising solution, federated learning, which enables collaborative training of machine learning models based on data from different sites without cross-site data sharing, has attracted considerable attention recently. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive survey of the recent development of federated learning methods in medical image analysis. We have systematically gathered research papers on federated learning and its applications in medical image analysis published between 2017 and 2023. Our search and compilation were conducted using databases from IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Science Direct, Springer Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed. In this survey, we first introduce the background of federated learning for dealing with privacy protection and collaborative learning issues. We then present a comprehensive review of recent advances in federated learning methods for medical image analysis. Specifically, existing methods are categorized based on three critical aspects of a federated learning system, including client end, server end, and communication techniques. In each category, we summarize the existing federated learning methods according to specific research problems in medical image analysis and also provide insights into the motivations of different approaches. In addition, we provide a review of existing benchmark medical imaging datasets and software platforms for current federated learning research. We also conduct an experimental study to empirically evaluate typical federated learning methods for medical image analysis. This survey can help to better understand the current research status, challenges, and potential research opportunities in this promising research field.

Indexed as

Data privacyFederated learningMachine learningMedical image analysis

Identifiers

PMID38559674
PMCPMC10976951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.