Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38559468›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2024

Chunyu Shang, Xiaoyan Liu, Guo Chen, Hao Zheng, Abid Khan, Guobin Li, Xiaohui Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Special Issue "Genetic Regulation of Plant Growth and Protection".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chunyu ShangCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Xiaoyan LiuCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Guo ChenCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Hao ZhengCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Abid KhanDepartment of Horticulture, The University of Haripur, Haripur, 22620, Pakistan.
Guobin LiCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Xiaohui HuCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CNNorthwest A&F University · CNUniversity of Haripur · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saline-alkali is an important abiotic stressor influencing tomato production. Exogenous methyl jasmonate (MeJA) is well known to increase tomato resistance to a variety of stresses, although its exact mechanism is yet unknown. In this study we confirmed that 22.5 μmol/l MeJA could significantly improve the saline-alkali stress resistance of tomato. Saline-alkali (300 mM) stress increased the endogenous MeJA and jasmonic acid (JA) contents of tomato by 18.8 and 13.4%, respectively. Exogenous application of 22.5 μmol/l MeJA increased the endogenous MeJA and JA contents in tomato by 15.2 and 15.9%, respectively. Furthermore, we found an important transcription factor,

Identifiers

PMID38559468
PMCPMC10980716
OpenAlexW4391212321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.