ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2024
Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Artery Dissections in Posterior Circulation.
Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery dissecting aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Pooled it
- Characteristics and outcomes of subarachnoid hemorrhage from vertebral artery dissection: A comparative study with other non-traumatic etiologies.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial artery dissections (IADs), although uncommon, are an important cause of cerebral infarction and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Some IADs can heal spontaneously after reconstitution of the vessel lumen with excellent prognosis. Meanwhile, others can progress to stroke that requires treatment. The incidence of IAD in the posterior circulation is higher than that in the anterior circulation. Anterior circulation dissections are more likely to develop into ischemia and posterior circulation lesions into hemorrhage. The mortality rate after IAD among patients with SAH is 19%-83%. Further, the mortality rate of IAD without SAH is 0%-3%. Patients with SAH commonly undergo surgery or receive neuroendovascular treatment (EVT) to prevent rebleeding. However, the treatment of IADs is empirical in the absence of data from randomized controlled trials. Recently, EVT has emerged and is considered for IADs because of its less invasiveness and perceived low rates of procedure-related morbidity with good efficacy. EVT strategies can be classified into deconstructive (involving sacrifice of the parent artery) and reconstructive (preserving blood flow via the parent vessel) techniques. In particular, the number of reports on reconstructive techniques is increasing. However, a reconstructive technique for ruptured IADs has not yet been established. This review aimed to provide an overview of IADs in the posterior circulation managed with EVT by performing a literature search.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.