ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2024
Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysm: Recent Trends in Coil Embolization with Adjunctive Technique.
Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coiling with the pEGASUS-HPC stent in wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective analysis.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2026Article
- Stent-assisted coiling using the pEGASUS-HPC stent for acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: A multicenter retrospective study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- Intrasaccular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) are sometimes challenging to treat. During endovascular treatment, it is important to prevent coil deviation and preserve normal vessels. Adjunctive balloon- and stent-assisted techniques have been developed. A meta-analysis of endovascular treatments of WNBAs revealed that only 40% of patients had complete occlusion. Recently, novel devices have been developed to expand the range of treatment options. Flow-diverter stents and intra-aneurysmal flow disruption devices do not require coils; however, coil embolization remains the standard procedure used by many neurointerventionists. This review describes the recent trends in adjunctive techniques for supporting coil embolization for WNBAs. We referred to literature on balloon-assisted techniques, stent-assisted techniques, Y-stenting, PulseRider, Barrel stents, Comaneci temporary stents, pCONUS, and eCLIPs. These reports showed that adequate embolization rates were generally greater than 80%, and the complete occlusion rate was as high as 94.6%. All devices had a relatively high occlusion rate; however, it may be inaccurate to simply compare each device because of the heterogeneity of the studies. It is important to select the best treatment for each individual case by considering not only literature-based efficacy and safety but also patient background, aneurysm characteristics, and operator experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.