ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2024
Evaluation of multi-parameter MRI in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is a prevalent gynecological malignancy, necessitating accurate preoperative staging for effective treatment planning. This study explores the application value of multi-parameter MRI in diagnosing and staging endometrial cancer. Methods: Seventy-six patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer underwent 3.0 T pelvic MRI within two weeks before surgery. Imaging data were analyzed based on FIGO clinical staging criteria. The study assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRI for each stage. Results: Postoperative pathology confirmed 71 cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma, 3 serous adenocarcinoma, and 2 clear cell carcinomas. MRI staging showed a high consistency (Kappa value = 0.786) with postoperative pathology. The overall accuracy of MRI diagnosis was 86.8%. Sensitivity and specificity varied for each stage: IA (91.3%, 96.2%), IB (88.6%, 93.8%), II (97.4%, 89.2%), and III (84.2%, 100%). Conclusion: While there was a slight misdiagnosis rate, the overall accuracy of preoperative MRI for endometrial cancer was high, aiding in precise diagnosis and clinical staging. MRI effectively identified myometrial infiltration, cervical involvement, paracentral extension, and lymph node metastasis. Further research with larger sample sizes is recommended for enhanced reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.