Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38559253›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Optimizing Design of Genomics Studies for Clonal Evolution Analysis.

Arjun Srivatsa, Russell Schwartz

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arjun SrivatsaRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9805-8272
Russell SchwartzRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4970-2252

Funding

Reconstructing mechanisms of somatic variation in diverse cellular lineagesR01HG010589 · NHGRI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, RUSSELL S · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic biotechnologies have seen rapid development over the past two decades, allowing for both the inference and modification of genetic and epigenetic information at the single cell level. While these tools present enormous potential for basic research, diagnostics, and treatment, they also raise difficult issues of how to design research studies to deploy these tools most effectively. In designing a study at the population or individual level, a researcher might combine several different sequencing modalities and sampling protocols, each with different utility, costs, and other tradeoffs. The central problem this paper attempts to address is then how one might create an optimal study design for a genomic analysis, with particular focus on studies involving somatic variation, typically for applications in cancer genomics. We pose the study design problem as a stochastic constrained nonlinear optimization problem and introduce a simulation-centered optimization procedure that iteratively optimizes the objective function using surrogate modeling combined with pattern and gradient search. Finally, we demonstrate the use of our procedure on diverse test cases to derive resource and study design allocations optimized for various objectives for the study of somatic cell populations.

Indexed as

CancerGenomicsOptimizationSomatic VariationStudy Design

Identifiers

PMID38559253
PMCPMC10980045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.