Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38559195›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Differences in Protein Capture by SP3 and SP4 Demonstrate Mechanistic Insights of Proteomics Clean-up Techniques.

Jessica M Conforti, Amanda M Ziegler, Charli S Worth, Adhwaitha M Nambiar, Jacob T Bailey, Joseph H Taube, Elyssia S Gallagher

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica M ConfortiDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97348, Waco, Texas 76798, United States.
Amanda M ZieglerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97348, Waco, Texas 76798, United States.
Charli S WorthDepartment of Biology, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97388, Waco, Texas 76798, United States.
Adhwaitha M NambiarDepartment of Biology, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97388, Waco, Texas 76798, United States.
Jacob T BaileyDepartment of Biology, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97388, Waco, Texas 76798, United States.
Joseph H TaubeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97348, Waco, Texas 76798, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3636-5189
Elyssia S GallagherDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97348, Waco, Texas 76798, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5411-7285
Baylor University · US

Funding

Assessing the Biomolecular Structures that Result from Electrospray IonizationR35GM150464 · NIGMS · BAYLOR UNIVERSITY · PI Elyssia S Gallagher · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
KDM6A function in epithelial-mesenchymal plasticityR15GM146188 · NIGMS · BAYLOR UNIVERSITY · PI TAUBE, JOSEPH H. · 2022 to 2023
$493k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM146188NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM150464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of proteomics experiments is to identify proteins to observe changes in cellular processes and diseases. One challenge in proteomics is the removal of contaminants following protein extraction, which can limit protein identification. Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3) is a clean-up technique in which proteins are captured on carboxylate-modified particles through a proposed hydrophilic-interaction-liquid-chromatography (HILIC)-like mechanism. However, recent results have suggested that proteins are captured in SP3 due to a protein-aggregation mechanism. Thus, solvent precipitation, single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP4) is a newer clean-up technique that employs protein-aggregation to capture proteins without modified particles. SP4 has previously enriched low-solubility proteins, though differences in protein capture could affect which proteins are detected and identified. We hypothesize that the mechanisms of capture for SP3 and SP4 are distinct. Herein, we assess the proteins identified and enriched using SP3 versus SP4 for MCF7 subcellular fractions and correlate protein capture in each method to protein hydrophobicity. Our results indicate that SP3 captures more hydrophilic proteins through a combination of HILIC-like and protein-aggregation mechanisms, while SP4 captures more hydrophobic proteins through a protein-aggregation mechanism. From these results, we recommend clean-up techniques based on protein-sample hydrophobicity to yield high proteome coverage in biological samples.

Indexed as

Detergent-Assisted DigestionMass Spectrometry (MS)ProteomicsSample PreparationSingle-Pot, Solid-Phase-Enhanced Sample-Preparation (SP3)Sodium Deoxycholate (SDC)Solvent Precipitation, Single-Pot, Solid-Phase-Enhanced Sample-Preparation (SP4)

Identifiers

PMID38559195
PMCPMC10980087
OpenAlexW4392814198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.