ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Subject-Agnostic Transformer-Based Neural Speech Decoding from Surface and Depth Electrode Signals.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates speech decoding from neural signals captured by intracranial electrodes. Most prior works can only work with electrodes on a 2D grid (i.e., Electrocorticographic or ECoG array) and data from a single patient. We aim to design a deep-learning model architecture that can accommodate both surface (ECoG) and depth (stereotactic EEG or sEEG) electrodes. The architecture should allow training on data from multiple participants with large variability in electrode placements and the trained model should perform well on participants unseen during training. Approach: We propose a novel transformer-based model architecture named SwinTW that can work with arbitrarily positioned electrodes by leveraging their 3D locations on the cortex rather than their positions on a 2D grid. We train subject-specific models using data from a single participant and multi-patient models exploiting data from multiple participants. Main Results: The subject-specific models using only low-density 8x8 ECoG data achieved high decoding Pearson Correlation Coefficient with ground truth spectrogram (PCC=0.817), over N=43 participants, outperforming our prior convolutional ResNet model and the 3D Swin transformer model. Incorporating additional strip, depth, and grid electrodes available in each participant (N=39) led to further improvement (PCC=0.838). For participants with only sEEG electrodes (N=9), subject-specific models still enjoy comparable performance with an average PCC=0.798. The multi-subject models achieved high performance on unseen participants, with an average PCC=0.765 in leave-one-out cross-validation. Significance: The proposed SwinTW decoder enables future speech neuroprostheses to utilize any electrode placement that is clinically optimal or feasible for a particular participant, including using only depth electrodes, which are more routinely implanted in chronic neurosurgical procedures. Importantly, the generalizability of the multi-patient models suggests that such a model can be applied to new patients that do not have paired acoustic and neural data, providing an advance in neuroprostheses for people with speech disability, where acoustic-neural training data is not feasible.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.