Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38559064›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Forecasting Acute Kidney Injury and Resource Utilization in ICU patients using longitudinal, multimodal models.

Yukun Tan, Merve Dede, Vakul Mohanty, Jinzhuang Dou, Holly Hill, Elmer Bernstam, Ken Chen

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yukun TanDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Merve DedeDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Vakul MohantyDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Jinzhuang DouDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Holly HillDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Elmer BernstamD. Bradley McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Ken ChenDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Systematic Characterization and Targeting of Neomorphic Drivers in CancerU01CA281902 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Benjamin Deneen, Han Liang · 2023 to 2026
$3.5M
Informatics for Functional Integration of Heterogeneous Cancer Genome and Transcriptome Sequencing DataU01CA247760 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHEN, KEN · 2020 to 2022
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA247760NCI NIH HHS U01 CA281902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have realized the potential of revolutionizing healthcare, such as predicting disease progression via longitudinal inspection of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and lab tests from patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICU). Although substantial literature exists addressing broad subjects, including the prediction of mortality, length-of-stay, and readmission, studies focusing on forecasting Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), specifically dialysis anticipation like Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) are scarce. The technicality of how to implement AI remains elusive. Objective: This study aims to elucidate the important factors and methods that are required to develop effective predictive models of AKI and CRRT for patients admitted to ICU, using EHRs in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of established predictive models, considering both time-series measurements and clinical notes from MIMIC-IV databases. Subsequently, we proposed a novel multi-modal model which integrates embeddings of top-performing unimodal models, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and BioMedBERT, and leverages both unstructured clinical notes and structured time series measurements derived from EHRs to enable the early prediction of AKI and CRRT. Results: Our multimodal model achieved a lead time of at least 12 hours ahead of clinical manifestation, with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.888 for AKI and 0.997 for CRRT, as well as an Area Under the Precision Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 0.727 for AKI and 0.840 for CRRT, respectively, which significantly outperformed the baseline models. Additionally, we performed a SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analysis using the expected gradients algorithm, which highlighted important, previously underappreciated predictive features for AKI and CRRT. Conclusion: Our study revealed the importance and the technicality of applying longitudinal, multimodal modeling to improve early prediction of AKI and CRRT, offering insights for timely interventions. The performance and interpretability of our model indicate its potential for further assessment towards clinical applications, to ultimately optimize AKI management and enhance patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)BioMedBERTContinuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT)Electronic Health Records (EHRs)Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)multi-modal

Identifiers

PMID38559064
PMCPMC10980131
OpenAlexW4392855314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.