Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38559019›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Physiological correlates of a simple saccadic-decision task to extended objects in superior colliculus.

B Caziot, B Cooper, M R Harwood, R M McPeek

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B CaziotGraduate Center for Vision Research, Department of Biological and Vision Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, 33 West 42 Street, New York, NY, 10036, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0887-8657
B CooperGraduate Center for Vision Research, Department of Biological and Vision Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, 33 West 42 Street, New York, NY, 10036, USA.
M R HarwoodDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of East London, London, UK.
R M McPeekGraduate Center for Vision Research, Department of Biological and Vision Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry, 33 West 42 Street, New York, NY, 10036, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9052-100X

Funding

Saccade Target Selection in Naturalistic Visual SearchR01EY030669 · NEI · STATE COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI ROBERT M MCPEEK, GREGORY J ZELINSKY · 2019 to 2026
$4.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our vision is best only in the center of our gaze, and we use saccadic eye movements to direct gaze to objects and features of interest. We make more than 180,000 saccades per day, and accurate and efficient saccades are crucial for most visuo-motor tasks. Saccades are typically studied using small point stimuli, despite the fact that most real-world visual scenes are composed of extended objects. Recent studies in humans have shown that the initiation latency of saccades is strongly dependent on the size of the target (the "size-latency effect"), perhaps reflecting a tradeoff between the cost of making a saccade to a target and the expected information gain that would result. Here, we investigate the neuronal correlates of the size-latency effect in the macaque superior colliculus. We analyzed the latency variations of saccades to different size targets within a stochastic accumulator model framework. The model predicted a steeper increase in activity for smaller targets compared to larger ones. Surprisingly, the model also predicted an increase in saccade initiation threshold for larger targets. We found that the activity of intermediate-layer SC visuomotor neurons is in close agreement with the model predictions. We also found evidence that these effects may be a consequence of the visual responses of SC neurons to targets of different sizes. These results shed new light on the sources of delay within the saccadic system, a system that we heavily depend upon in the performance of most visuo-motor tasks.

Indexed as

Decision-makingSaccadesSuperior Colliculus

Identifiers

PMID38559019
PMCPMC10979857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.