ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Modeling interpretable correspondence between cell state and perturbation response with CellCap.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell transcriptomics, in conjunction with genetic and compound perturbations, offers a robust approach for exploring cellular behaviors in diverse contexts. Such experiments allow uncovering cell-state-specific responses to perturbations, a crucial aspect in unraveling the intricate molecular mechanisms governing cellular behavior and potentially discovering novel regulatory pathways and therapeutic targets. However, prevailing computational methods predominantly focus on predicting average cellular responses, disregarding the inherent response heterogeneity associated with cell state diversity. In this study, we present CellCap, a deep generative model designed for the end-to-end analysis of single-cell perturbation experiments. CellCap employs sparse dictionary learning in a latent space to deconstruct cell-state-specific perturbation responses into a set of transcriptional response programs. These programs are then utilized by each perturbation condition and each cell at varying degrees. The incorporation of specific model design choices, such as dot-product cross-attention between cell states and response programs, along with a linearly-decoded latent space, underlay the interpretation power of CellCap. We evaluate CellCap's model interpretability through multiple simulated scenarios and apply it to two real single-cell perturbation datasets. These datasets feature either heterogeneous cellular populations or a complex experimental setup. Our results demonstrate that CellCap successfully uncovers the relationship between cell state and perturbation response, unveiling novel insights overlooked in previous analyses. The model's interpretability, coupled with its effectiveness in capturing heterogeneous responses, positions CellCap as a valuable tool for advancing our understanding of cellular behaviors in the context of perturbation experiments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.