ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2022
Right ventricular longitudinal strain on CMR predicts ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in cardiac sarcoidosis.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular imaging techniques for electrophysiologists.Nature cardiovascular research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and mortality in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). However, image resolution limits the detection of RV LGE. Global longitudinal RV strain (RVS) correlates to RV scar on electroanatomical mapping and RV function. Objective: We evaluated the association between RVS on CMR and VA/death (combined-primary-endpoint (CPE)) in patients with CS. Methods: RVS and RV LGE on MRI were retrospectively compared to variables known to predict outcomes in 66 patients with CS. Outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interrogations over median [IQR] 3.7[1.7, 6.3] years. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate survival. Harrell's C-statistic was used to compare variables in risk prediction models. Results: 62.1 % of patients were male, with a mean age [SD] of 52.3 [9.6] years and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 51.1[17.5]%. 9 patients with the primary endpoint were more likely to be Caucasian (p = 0.01) with prior VAs (p = 0.002), be on anti-arrhythmic drugs (p = 0.001) with an ICD (p = 0.002). In multivariable analyses adjusted for age, race, and history of VA, RVS (1.18 [1.05-1.31], p = 0.004), RV EDVI (1.08[1.01, 1.14], p = 0.02), and LV LGE (1.07[1.00, 1.13], p = 0.04) predicted the CPE. Risk prediction models including RVS (Cstatistic 0.94), outperformed those including RV and LV LGE (0.89-0.92). Conclusion: RVS on CMR was the best predictor of VA and mortality in CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.