Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38558877›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine international2024

The Diagnostic Evaluation of the SINEH Cardiopulmonary Triage Scale and the Emergency Severity Index in the Emergency Department: A Comparative Study.

Mahbobeh VatanKhah, Javad Malekzadeh, Mohammad-Davood Sharifi, Amir Mirhaghi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahbobeh VatanKhahIntensive Care Nursing, Student Research Committee, Nursing and Midwifery School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4923-6790
Javad MalekzadehDepartment of Prehospital Emergency Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4987-4740
Mohammad-Davood SharifiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-6655
Amir MirhaghiNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4482-1156
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnostic evaluation of the emergency severity index (ESI) in the triage of patients with cardiopulmonary complaints has a high sensitivity but a low specificity in the emergency department (ED). Therefore, triage scales with more accurate diagnostic evaluation are required. As a result, accuracy of the SINEH triage scale (SinTS) and the ESI was compared to compare mistriage of critically ill patients with cardiopulmonary complaints. Methods: This descriptive, analytical and cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2022 and April 2023. In this study, two nurses independently examined each patient using two triage scales. The admission unit and length of hospital stay were also recorded. The outcome was classified as high-risk admission (cardiac care unit and intensive care unit) and low-risk admission (internal unit or discharge from the ED). Undertriage and overtiage were defined as high-risk admission with triage level 3 and 4 and low-risk admission with triage level 1 or 2, respectively. A panel of experts evaluated content validity of SinTS and kappa designating agreement on relevance reported. The inter-rater reliability of two scales was also reported. Results: Finally, the study included 145 patients. The average age of the patients studied was 61.35 years. SinTS has a total mistriage of 29.63%, with 4.13% being undertriage and 25.5% being overtriage. In ESI, the total mistriage is 66.8%, with 1.3% being undertriage and 65.5% being overtriage. The undertriage of the two scales did not differ significantly by admission unit ( Conclusion: SINEH triage scale has achieved the optimal accuracy in recognizing the acuity of the patients with chest pain and dyspnea by using SpO

Identifiers

PMID38558877
PMCPMC10980548
OpenAlexW4394764822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.