SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2024
Analyzing the impact of team-building interventions on team cohesion in sports teams: a meta-analysis study.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Sex in Individual and Group Rowing Performance.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Contributions of Clinical Simulation to Group Cohesion: A Quasi-Experimental Study.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Article
- Article
- Psychological readiness mediates performance transfer in constraints-led, game-based basketball training: evidence from a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Can participation in sports enhance adolescents' subjective wellbeing? The chain mediation role of social support and basic psychological needs.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Effects of different physical exercise programs on psychological stress and group cohesion in children.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Narcissism in Action: Perceptions, Team Dynamics, and Performance in Naturalistic Escape Room Settings.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Randomized controlled trial protocol on enhancing students' togetherness, relatedness, and interactions for learning in physical education: the TRI-PE project.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Strengthening social skills: developing a social competence intervention for physical education using intervention mapping-protocol paper.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Participation in team sports requires collaboration among multiple individuals over an extended period. Success in the game relies on more than just individual excellence; it necessitates effective teamwork. Team-building interventions have been shown to enhance team functioning, particularly in fostering cohesion among sports teams. This study aims to identify crucial factors in team-building interventions that contribute to improved team cohesion in sports teams. Methods: A comprehensive meta-analysis of 15 articles was conducted to identify the crucial factors in team-building interventions that contribute to improved team cohesion in sports teams. The analysis focused on the age of participants, level of performance, and duration of interventions. Results: The results of the analysis revealed that the positive impact of team-building was found to be most pronounced when the participants were between 15 and 20 years old, performed at collegiate teams, and engaged in interventions lasting more than 2 weeks. Among the four types of cohesion in sports teams, individual attraction to the group task (ATG-T) emerged as the aspect most influenced by team-building interventions. Discussion: These findings provide valuable insights into the factors influencing the success of team-building interventions in enhancing team cohesion within sports teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.