Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38558763›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2024

The Impact of Omitting Contralateral Systematic Biopsy on the Surgical Planning of Patients with a Unilateral Suspicious Lesion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.

Daniël L van den Kroonenberg, Joëlle D Stoter, Auke Jager, Hans Veerman, Marinus J Hagens, Ivo G Schoots, Arnoud W Postema, Robert J Hoekstra, Daniela E Oprea-Lager, Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniël L van den KroonenbergAmsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joëlle D StoterAmsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Auke JagerAmsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hans VeermanAmsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marinus J HagensAmsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivo G SchootsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arnoud W PostemaAmsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert J HoekstraDepartment of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Daniela E Oprea-LagerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jakko A NieuwenhuijzenAmsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pim J van LeeuwenProstate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
André N VisAmsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: A combined approach of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) and bilateral systematic biopsy (SBx) is advised in patients who have an increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa). The diagnostic gain of SBx in detecting PCa for treatment planning of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is unknown. This study aims to determine the impact of omitting contralateral SBx on the surgical planning of patients undergoing RARP in terms of nerve-sparing surgery (NSS) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Methods: Case files from 80 men with biopsy-proven PCa were studied. All men had a unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI, and underwent TBx and bilateral SBx. Case files were presented to five urologists for the surgical planning of RARP. Each case file was presented randomly using two different sets of information: (1) results of TBx + bilateral SBx, and (2) results of TBx + ipsilateral SBx. The urologists assessed whether they would perform NSS and/or ePLND. Key findings and limitations: A change in the surgical plan concerning NSS on the contralateral side was observed in 9.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4-12.2) of cases. Additionally, the indication for ePLND changed in 5.3% (95% CI 3.3-7.9) of cases. Interobserver agreement based on Fleiss' kappa changed from 0.44 to 0.15 for the indication of NSS and from 0.84 to 0.83 for the indication of ePLND. Conclusions and clinical implications: In our series, the diagnostic information obtained from contralateral SBx has limited impact on the surgical planning of patients with a unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI scheduled to undergo RARP. Patient summary: In patients with one-sided prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging, omitting biopsies on the other side rarely changed the surgical plan with respect to nerve-sparing surgery and the indication to perform extended lymph node dissection.

Indexed as

Magnetic resonance imagingPerilesional biopsyProstate biopsyProstate cancerProstatectomySurgical planningSystematic biopsyTargeted biopsyUnilateral lesion

Identifiers

PMID38558763
PMCPMC10981034
OpenAlexW4393063029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.