ArticleCureus2024
Comparative Assessment of Various Cephalometric Parameters Used for Determining Vertical Skeletal Dysplasia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Styloid Process Elongation as an Incidental Finding in Adult Orthodontic Patients: Prevalence, Morphology and Diagnostic Implications from Panoramic Radiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- External Root Resorption Associated with Orthodontic Treatment-Descriptive Correlations of Biological and Dental Risk Factors.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Classification Performance of Deep Learning Models for the Assessment of Vertical Dimension on Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effects of AMCOPJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Upper Airway Width and Facial Height Cephalometric Parameters in Adult Caucasians with Skeletal Class I and Class III Malocclusion.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Cross-Sectional Observational Study of the Differences in Cephalometric Parameters in German Class I/II Orthodontic Patients.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- A cephalometric analysis of the antegonial notch in relation to the direction of mandibular growth.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of the study is to assess and correlate the different cephalometric parameters used to determine the vertical jaw relationship.
methodsCephalometric radiographs from 148 patients were assessed and comparison was made using all eight parameters. Statistical analysis was performed using mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variance. A correlation was found between different variables using the Pearson's correlation coefficient.
resultsIn the entire sample, the basal plane angle displayed the most variable distribution, while the R angle displayed the most homogeneous distribution. There was a significant correlation found between the Jarabak ratio, Steiner's mandibular plane angle (SN-GoGn), Frankfort mandibular plane angle (FMA), R angle, and DR angle. There was a moderate to weak correlation between the Y-axis, basal plane angle, and facial height ratio with other skeletal analyses.
conclusionAmong angular variables DR angle, R angle, SN-GoGn and FMA can be used and among linear variables Jarabak ratio could be used reliably to assess the growth pattern. It suggested that in order to obtain an accurate evaluation of the vertical jaw relationship, a variety of measurements should be combined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.