ArticleCureus2024
Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Giant Porokeratosis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Case of Refractory Giant Porokeratosis, Treated With a New Treatment Approach Consisting of Ablative COClinical case reports · 2026Article
- Topical Treatments for Rare Genetic Dermatological Diseases: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porokeratosis encompasses a diverse group of dermatoses, both acquired and genetic, marked by a keratinization disorder. Porokeratosis of Mibelli (PKM) presents as solitary plaques or multiple papules/macules with central atrophy and raised hyperkeratotic borders. Here, we present a case of giant porokeratosis (GPK), a rare form often considered a morphological variant of PKM, with unique clinical and histopathological aspects. Our case involves a 29-year-old patient with a 15 × 10 cm irregular plaque on the dorsal aspect of the right hand. The patient was previously prescribed various topical treatments (retinoids, calcineurin inhibitors, and combinations of corticosteroids with vitamin D3 analogs) and systemic retinoids without improvement before presenting to our department. Due to the high risk of neoplastic transformation and the unavailability of imiquimod, the patient was recommended topical 5-fluorouracil treatment. The trajectory of the lesion under treatment revealed a favorable evolution, and the patient was subjected to regular monitoring every three months to assess the ongoing progress. Recognizing GPK as a high-risk variant is crucial for dermatologists, and it requires a personalized approach. Regular monitoring is advised to detect potential malignant transformations promptly. Future research holds promise for diagnostic advancements, refined treatment modalities, and a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying malignancy in porokeratosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.