ArticleCureus2024
Black Digits Matter: A Multispecialty Enigma.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Digital ischemia is alike any other visceral ischemic event leading to severe tissue damage ultimately causing necrosis of the involved extremity. It's like a preview of the upcoming systemic disorder and can present itself in any specialty and hence everyone, be it a physician or a surgeon must be primed toward how to proceed with a case of digital ischemia. In this case series, we present six such cases that presented with digital ischemic events either as a sole presentation or were followed by other systemic manifestations that led to their evaluation and ultimately the etiology behind it. Material and method Patients visiting Rheumatology OPD with complaints suggestive of digital ischemia were included in this study. All patients underwent thorough history taking and clinical examination to establish the cause of digital ischemia. Patients with probable infective, trauma, cardiac, and drug-induced causes and malignancies were excluded. As per probable autoimmune causes, patients underwent evaluation via antinuclear antibodies by immunofluorescence (ANA by IF), antiphospholipid antibodies like lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin antibodies (AcL) and anti Beta2GP1 antibodies, extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) and in cases of suspected vasculitis doppler ultrasound and angiography. Results Six patients were identified as cases primarily presenting with digital ischemia or with a prior history of digital ischemia. Two patients were of the pediatric age group, one 16-year-old male presenting with acute arthritis and a history of digital ischemia one year back, and the other was a 12-year-old female with blackening of the second toe in her left foot with a history of similar complaints in the left great toe for which she underwent amputation of that toe. Other four cases were of the adult age group, with two cases of scleroderma, one with systemic lupus erythematosus, and one with Takayasu arteritis. All of these patients primarily presented to departments other than rheumatology. Conclusion Digital ischemia is a pan-specialty problem with the etiologies spreading across a vast spectrum of rheumatological disorders, many of which may present to different specialties initially, later discovered to be part of the systemic manifestation of autoimmune diseases. Hence, it becomes imperative to have a rheumatological perspective in these cases of digital ischemia which all specialities should be aware of, and timely referral may prevent permanent loss of the digits and in some cases the entire limb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.