ArticleCureus2024
Late Diagnosis of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis by Skin Biopsy in a Lung Transplant Candidate Patient.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the case of a lung transplant candidate under veno-venous membrane oxygenation assistance (VV ECMO) whose diagnosis of emphysema of undetermined etiology was redefined as Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) due to a scalp skin biopsy performed years after the beginning of his respiratory symptoms. A 20-year-old patient started three years before his admission with progressive dyspnea leading to a diagnosis of bullous emphysema of undetermined cause, which evolved into respiratory failure and evaluation for bilateral lung transplant. Three years later, he developed bilateral pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation. When refractory hypoxemia ensued, he had to be placed on VV ECMO. Under these conditions, he was transferred to our center and listed for a bilateral pulmonary transplantation. Forty-eight hours after admission, and due to intense polyuria, central diabetes insipidus was diagnosed. In this clinical context, the presence of cutaneous lesions on the scalp was reconsidered and biopsied under the presumption of possible LCH, with pathology analysis confirming the diagnosis. He continued to be assisted with VV ECMO for 66 more days as a bridge to transplantation, developing multi-organ failure and passing away before a donor organ was available. The diagnosis of LCH should be considered in any adult patient with bullous emphysema of undetermined cause. Given the possibility of early therapeutic interventions, the search for its clinical associations (e.g., diabetes insipidus and/or skin lesions) should be a systematic part of the etiologic workup. The availability of skin specimens to reach a diagnosis makes its thorough search an important part of the diagnostic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.