ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of Frontal Sinus Volume and Cranial Base Length Based on Different Vertical Skeletal Patterns: A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of 3D reconstruction of paranasal sinuses for simulated personal identification using Dolphin imaging and mimics software.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Is There Variation in the Morphology of the Frontal Sinus in Individuals with Different Craniofacial Patterns? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Evaluating craniofacial growth is an essential component of orthodontic treatment, and it is assessed by examining the cranial base. The anterior cranial base is regarded as a stable structure, and the frontal sinus is also recognised as a contributing component in the formation of the cranial base. The frontal sinus, a cavity present in the frontal bone, displays variation in both size and shape and has an impact on the overall structure of the skull and face. This study aims to evaluate the impact of vertical skeletal pattern and gender on the volume of the frontal sinus. Materials and methodology In this study, 90 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from the record's section were included, comprising 46 males (55.44%) and 44 females (48.88%) aged 20 to 35 undergoing orthodontic treatment. The assessment involved evaluating vertical skeletal patterns using a lateral cephalogram derived from the CBCT scans, and volumetric analysis of the frontal sinus was conducted using Dolphin Imaging software (version 11.9; Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, California). Statistical analysis was performed on the collected data using SPSS software, version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Pearson correlation, a one-way ANOVA test to determine any statistically significant differences between the means of both frontal sinus volume and cranial base length groups individually and an independent t-test to compare the sample means between the frontal sinus volume and cranial base length groups were performed. Results: A non-significant association was observed between frontal sinus volume and cranial base length in skeletal open bite (p = 0.73) and skeletal deep bite (p = 0.12) between males and females, which implies there is no substantial association between frontal sinus volume (p = 0.08) and cranial base length (p = 0.41) in the different vertical skeletal patterns. Conclusion: Frontal sinus volume was similar in subjects with a skeletal open bite and a deep bite. Males and females did not show a difference in frontal sinus volume. Hence, it was concluded that frontal sinus volume and anterior cranial base cannot be used as parameters to predict vertical malocclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.