ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Clinical Equivalence of Truwax® and Ethicon® Bone Waxes for Sternal Wound Hemostasis: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncidence of sternal dehiscence, wound infection, and mortality are prevalent following sternotomy. Bone wax is widely used over the sternal edges for augmenting hemostasis. This study evaluated the clinical equivalence of Truwax
methodsThe primary endpoint of this prospective (May 2022-April 2023), parallel-group, two-arm, randomized, single-blind, multicenter study was to evaluate the proportion of subjects having sternal dehiscence within 26 weeks of median sternotomy closure. Secondary endpoints assessed the average time to hemostasis on sternum sides, bone wax properties, number of dressing changes, sternal bone instability (clinically/chest radiography), pain, perioperative/postoperative complications, blood and blood products used, duration of intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital stay, reoperations, time taken to return back to work and normal day-to-day activities, subject satisfaction and quality of life (QoL), and adverse events. A probability of <0.05 was considered significant.
resultsNo incidence of sternal dehiscence or postoperative complications was witnessed. Time to hemostasis, bone wax properties, number of dressing changes, sternal stability, pain, blood and blood products used, duration of ICU/hospital stay, reoperations, time taken to return back to normal day-to-day activities and to work, and subject satisfaction and QoL were comparable between Truwax
conclusionTruwax
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.