ArticleCureus2024
A Survey Exploring Inflammatory Back Pain in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Diagnostic delay of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a widely recognized issue worldwide, providing a great burden for patients with this disease. AxSpA is present in a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This UK study primarily aims to identify the presence of inflammatory back pain (IBP) in patients attending IBD clinic. Further aims of this study include investigating if participants had received further referrals and diagnoses for their IBP and considering factors contributing to diagnostic delay. Methods Patients were recruited from a Royal Free London NHS Trust hospital's IBD clinic. Each participant completed a 23-question survey. The Berlin criteria were applied to the questions to investigate the presence of IBP. Further questions were asked about their IBD diagnosis and treatment, the healthcare professionals they had seen for their back pain, and other extra-articular features associated with axSpA. Results Seventy-five patients completed the online survey sent out via email. Forty percent (n = 30) of participants were female and 60% (n = 45) were male. Sixty-one percent (n = 36) of participants from the colitis clinic reported they had back pain, and 41% of the participants reported back pain for over three months. Of these, 39% (12) of participants fulfilled the Berlin criteria for IBP. Of patients experiencing back pain for over three months, we found that 10% (3) fulfilled the Berlin criteria but had not received a diagnosis for their IBP. All patients who had fulfilled the Berlin criteria but had not received a diagnosis for their IBP had seen their general practitioner (GP) and an allied healthcare professional, but not a rheumatologist. Conclusions This study highlights the presence of possibly undiagnosed axSpA in patients with IBD. The reasons for the diagnostic delay of axSpA are multifactorial. We consider specific patient characteristics, lack of awareness and education of the condition, and issues in the referral process. There is a need to improve education and awareness of axSpA, reconsider referral processes, and consider new initiatives such as joint specialty clinics to identify and treat axSpA on time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.