Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38558596›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Delayed Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Patients Treated With Tumor-Treating Fields.

Norihiko Saito, Nozomi Hirai, Sho Sato, Morito Hayashi, Satoshi Iwabuchi

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Norihiko SaitoNeurosurgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, JPN.
Nozomi HiraiNeurosurgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, JPN.
Sho SatoNeurosurgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, JPN.
Morito HayashiNeurosurgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, JPN.
Satoshi IwabuchiNeurosurgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, JPN.
Toho University Ohashi Medical Center · JPToho University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) is an established treatment modality for glioblastoma. False progression to chemoradiation is a known problem in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), with most cases occurring within three months of radiation therapy. In this report, we present two cases of delayed pseudoprogression caused by TTFields. Two patients with GBM who received TTFields showed signs of radiographic progression six months after the completion of radiation therapy. Patient 1 was a 37-year-old female with a glioblastoma in the right temporal lobe. Patient 2 was a 70-year-old male with glioblastoma in the left temporal lobe. Both patients received radiation therapy, followed by temozolomide (TMZ) maintenance therapy and TTFields. Patient 1 underwent a second resection; however, the pathology revealed only a treatment effect, and the final diagnosis was a pseudoprogression. In Case 2, the disease resolved with steroid therapy alone. In both patients, the lesions appeared later than during the typical pseudoprogression period. A recent study reported that TTFields increase the permeability of the plasma cell membrane, which may result in further leakage of gadolinium into the extracellular lumen. Further studies are needed to better characterize delayed pseudoprogression and improve treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

electric fieldsglioblastomaglioblastoma multiformepseudoprogressionradiation therapytemozolomidettfields

Identifiers

PMID38558596
PMCPMC10979818
OpenAlexW4392242129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.