ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Concerns with OpenAI's Sora in Medicine.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Text-to-Video Generative Artificial Intelligence in Pediatrics: Potential Applications, Ethical Considerations, and Future Directions.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Exploring medical students' attitudes and perceptions toward artificial intelligence in medicine in Shandong Province, China.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Revolution of AAV in Drug Discovery: From Delivery System to Clinical Application.Journal of medical virology · 2025Review
- The first birthday of OpenAI's Sora: A promising but cautious future in medicine.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- Application of transformer architectures in generative video modeling for neurosurgical education.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Looking Back on Digital Medical Education Over the Last 25 Years and Looking to the Future: Narrative Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Open AI's Sora represents a ground-breaking innovation in AI that can generate lifelike and imaginative visual scenes based on text prompts. However, Sora has also produced some new concerns surrounding artificial video generation in medicine. While Sora is highly promising to enhance patient education, facilitate remote consultations and simulate surgical procedures, AI-generated videos also bring technical, legal, and ethical challenges. In this paper, we explore the clinical and ethical implications of Sora's AI-generated videos in the field of medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38558354What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.