ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
A Data-Driven Approach to Estimate Human Center of Mass State During Perturbed Locomotion Using Simulated Wearable Sensors.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Center of mass feedback for joint torque control during perturbed standing: a potential generalizable control approach for balance augmentation in wearable robots.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Center of Mass Feedback for joint torque control: a generalizable approach for balance augmentation in wearable robots.Research square · 2026Article
- Detecting artificially impaired balance in human locomotion: metrics, perturbation effects and detection thresholds.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Enables Rapid Detection of Slips Using a Robotic Hip Exoskeleton.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Center of mass (COM) state, specifically in a local reference frame (i.e., relative to center of pressure), is an important variable for controlling and quantifying bipedal locomotion. However, this metric is not easily attainable in real time during human locomotion experiments. This information could be valuable when controlling wearable robotic exoskeletons, specifically for stability augmentation where knowledge of COM state could enable step placement planners similar to bipedal robots. Here, we explored the ability of simulated wearable sensor-driven models to rapidly estimate COM state during steady state and perturbed walking, spanning delayed estimates (i.e., estimating past state) to anticipated estimates (i.e., estimating future state). We used various simulated inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor configurations typically found on lower limb exoskeletons and a temporal convolutional network (TCN) model throughout this analysis. We found comparable COM estimation capabilities across hip, knee, and ankle exoskeleton sensor configurations, where device type did not significantly influence error. We also found that anticipating COM state during perturbations induced a significant increase in error proportional to anticipation time. Delaying COM state estimates significantly increased accuracy for velocity estimates but not position estimates. All tested conditions resulted in models with R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.