ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Correlation between pressure gradient from echocardiography and peak-to-peak pressure gradient from cardiac catheterization or surgery in patients with coarctation of aorta.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning for predicting transvalvular gradient outcomes for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for native aortic stenosis.JTCVS structural and endovascular · 2026Article
- Machine learning methods to predict transvalvular gradient waveform post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement using preprocedural echocardiogram.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- Hypertension in aortic coarctation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Investigation of Relationship between Hemodynamic and Morphometric Characteristics of Aortas in Pediatric Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gold standard for assessing pressure gradients (PG) across coarctation involves measurements obtained through cardiac catheterization or surgical intervention. There has been ongoing discussion regarding the accuracy of non-invasive methods for estimating these gradients. This study sought to establish the correlation and agreement between the systolic blood pressure (SBP) gradient between the upper and lower extremities, as well as, the mean and maximum PG derived from echocardiography, in comparison to the peak-to-peak pressure gradient obtained from either cardiac catheterization or surgery. We conducted a retrospective study on patients < 18 years diagnosed with coarctation at Chiang Mai University Hospital from 2011 to 2022. The study involved the measurement of the SBP gradient between the upper and lower extremities, mean and maximum PG using echocardiography, peak-to-peak pressure gradient obtained from cardiac catheterization, and pressure gradient recorded during surgical procedures. The Spearman's correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were employed to assess correlation and agreement. Fifty-four patients with aortic coarctation were enrolled. The mean PG measured by echocardiography showed a significantly moderate correlation (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and the highest level of agreement according to Bland Altman plots, in comparison to the peak-to-peak pressure gradient measured during both cardiac catheterization and surgical procedure. The max PG demonstrated a notable overestimation compared to the gold standard (mean difference + 13.14 with a slope of biases + 0.64, p < 0.001). The mean PG obtained through echocardiography has more potential to be applied in practical application in predicting pressure gradient in patients with coarctation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.