Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38558290›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology

Using imaging modalities to predict nanoparticle distribution and treatment efficacy in solid tumors: The growing role of ultrasound.

Michaela B Cooley, Dana Wegierak, Agata A Exner

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiolabeled AgScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michaela B CooleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7955-3745
Dana WegierakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1758-2417
Agata A ExnerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3913-7066
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
Improved Detection of Prostate Cancer with Nanoparticle-based Ultrasound Contrast Agents Targeted to PSMAR01EB025741 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI James Peter Basilion, Agata A Exner · 2018 to 2026
$4.1M
Drug-Loaded Nanobubbles for Ultrasound Enhanced Delivery to Colon Cancer Liver MetastasisR01EB028144 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI EXNER, AGATA A · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
Assessing vascular permeability and nanobubble extravasation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound imagingF30HL160111 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI COOLEY, MICHAELA · 2021 to 2023
$103k
NHLBI NIH HHS F30 HL160111NHLBI NIH HHS F30HL160111NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025741NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB025741NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028144NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB028144NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomedicine in oncology has not had the success in clinical impact that was anticipated in the early stages of the field's development. Ideally, nanomedicines selectively accumulate in tumor tissue and reduce systemic side effects compared to traditional chemotherapeutics. However, this has been more successful in preclinical animal models than in humans. The causes of this failure to translate may be related to the intra- and inter-patient heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment. Predicting whether a patient will respond positively to treatment prior to its initiation, through evaluation of characteristics like nanoparticle extravasation and retention potential in the tumor, may be a way to improve nanomedicine success rate. While there are many potential strategies to accomplish this, prediction and patient stratification via noninvasive medical imaging may be the most efficient and specific strategy. There have been some preclinical and clinical advances in this area using MRI, CT, PET, and other modalities. An alternative approach that has not been studied as extensively is biomedical ultrasound, including techniques such as multiparametric contrast-enhanced ultrasound (mpCEUS), doppler, elastography, and super-resolution processing. Ultrasound is safe, inexpensive, noninvasive, and capable of imaging the entire tumor with high temporal and spatial resolution. In this work, we summarize the in vivo imaging tools that have been used to predict nanoparticle distribution and treatment efficacy in oncology. We emphasize ultrasound imaging and the recent developments in the field concerning CEUS. The successful implementation of an imaging strategy for prediction of nanoparticle accumulation in tumors could lead to increased clinical translation of nanomedicines, and subsequently, improved patient outcomes. This article is categorized under: Diagnostic Tools In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery Emerging Technologies.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesNeoplasmsAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNanomedicineTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentUltrasonographycancerEPRmedical imagingnanomedicineultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38558290
PMCPMC11006412
OpenAlexW4393382605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.