Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38558171›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2024

Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Japanese version of the University of California Los Angeles scleroderma clinical trial consortium gastrointestinal tract instrument: Application to efficacy assessment of intravenous immunoglobulin administration.

Kazuki M Matsuda, Eiki Sugimoto, Yoshiaki Ako, Marie Kitamura, Mai Miyahara, Hirohito Kotani, Yuta Norimatsu, Teruyoshi Hisamoto, Ai Kuzumi, Takemichi Fukasawa and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuki M MatsudaDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6755-8047
Eiki SugimotoDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki AkoDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Marie KitamuraDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mai MiyaharaDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirohito KotaniDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta NorimatsuDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7649-0806
Teruyoshi HisamotoDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ai KuzumiDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2261-7469
Takemichi FukasawaDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinichi SatoDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayumi YoshizakiDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-9140
The University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and assess the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Japanese version of the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium gastrointestinal tract (GIT) Instrument 2.0 (the GIT score), as an evaluation tool for GIT symptoms in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The Japanese version of the GIT score was constructed using the forward-backward method. The reliability and validity of this instrument were evaluated in a cohort of 38 SSc patients. Correlation analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the GIT score and existing patient-reported outcome measures. Additionally, the sensitivity of the GIT score was examined by comparing GIT scores before and after intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration in 10 SSc-myositis overlap patients, as IVIG has recently demonstrated effectiveness in alleviating GIT symptoms of SSc. As a result, the Japanese version of the GIT score exhibited internal consistency and a significant association with the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Furthermore, the total GIT score, as well as the reflux and distention/bloating subscales, displayed moderate correlations with the EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) pain/discomfort subscale and the Short Form-36 body pain subscale. Notably, following IVIG treatment, there was a statistically significant reduction in the total GIT score and multiple subscales. We first validated the Japanese version of the GIT score in Japanese SSc patients in real-world clinical settings. This instrument holds promise for application in future clinical trials involving this patient population.

Indexed as

Immunoglobulins, IntravenousScleroderma, SystemicAdultAgedFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexImmunoglobulins, Intravenousautoantibodycytokinegastrointestinal symptomintravenous immunoglobulinpatient‐reported outcomesystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID38558171
PMCPMC11483899
OpenAlexW4393375454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.