Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38558147›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2025

Lavender oil preparation Silexan is effective in mild-to-moderate major depression: a randomized, placebo- and reference-controlled trial.

Siegfried Kasper, Hans-Peter Volz, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Sandra Schläfke, Stephan Klement, Ion-George Anghelescu, Erich Seifritz

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Siegfried KasperCenter for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 4, 1090, Vienna, Austria. siegfried.kasper@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8278-191X
Hans-Peter VolzWürzburg, Former Medical Director Hospital for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine Schloss Werneck, Werneck, Germany.
Hans-Jürgen MöllerClinic and Policlinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Sandra SchläfkeDepartment of Research and Development, Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Stephan KlementDepartment of Research and Development, Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Ion-George AnghelescuClinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Mental Health Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Erich SeifritzDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Dr Willmar Schwabe (Germany) · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety and depressive disorders have overlapping symptoms and share common neurobiological pathways. Antidepressant drugs have been demonstrated to be efficacious in anxiety as well. Vice versa, it may also be promising to investigate the efficacy of anxiolytic drugs such as silexan in major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with a mild or moderate, single or recurrent episode of MDD and a total score of 19-34 points on the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were randomized to receive 1 × 80 mg/d silexan, 1 × 50 mg/d sertraline, or placebo double-blind, double-dummy for 56 days. The primary outcome measure was the MADRS total score change between baseline and treatment end. Treatment groups were compared using a treatment policy estimand. 498 subjects (silexan 170, sertraline 171, placebo 157) were treated and analyzed. After 8 weeks, silexan and sertraline were superior to placebo for MADRS total score reduction, with absolute differences to placebo of 2.17 (95% confidence interval: 0.58; 3.76) points and 2.59 (1.02; 4.17) points, respectively (p < 0.01). Moreover, silexan was superior to placebo for alleviation of functional impairment according to the Sheehan Disability Scale with a difference of 2.40 (1.04; 3.76) points (p < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated; eructation was the most frequent adverse effect of silexan. The study confirms the antidepressant efficacy of silexan in mild or moderate MDD, including significant improvements in the subjects' functional capacity. The results for sertraline confirm the assay sensitivity of the trial. Both drugs were well tolerated.Trial registrationEudraCT2020-000688-22 first entered on 12/08/2020.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsMajor Depressive DisorderOils, VolatileOutcome Assessment, Health CarePlant OilsSertralineAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLavandulaMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntidepressive Agentslavender oilOils, VolatilePlant OilsSertralineClinical trialDepressionLavenderSilexanTreatment efficacy

Identifiers

PMID38558147
PMCPMC12500811
OpenAlexW4393387525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.