Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38558022›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Characterizing sow feed intake during lactation to explain litter and subsequent farrowing performance.

Jorge Estrada, Danielle C Johnson, Kelsey L Kyle, Jeremy Perez, Eric Parr, Michael W Welch, Casey Neill, Beau A Peterson, Dustin D Boler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorge EstradaCarthage Veterinary Service Ltd., Carthage, IL 62321, USA.
Danielle C JohnsonCarthage Veterinary Service Ltd., Carthage, IL 62321, USA.
Kelsey L KyleCarthage Veterinary Service Ltd., Carthage, IL 62321, USA.
Jeremy PerezCarthage Veterinary Service Ltd., Carthage, IL 62321, USA.
Eric ParrCarthage Veterinary Service Ltd., Carthage, IL 62321, USA.
Michael W WelchCarthage Veterinary Service Ltd., Carthage, IL 62321, USA.
Casey NeillCarthage Veterinary Service Ltd., Carthage, IL 62321, USA.
Beau A PetersonCarthage Veterinary Service Ltd., Carthage, IL 62321, USA.
Dustin D BolerCarthage Veterinary Service Ltd., Carthage, IL 62321, USA.
Carthage College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in feed intake results in nearly 20% of sows consuming less than the recommended lysine (Lys) intake for lactating sows. The Lys requirement for lactating sows is based on litter size and piglet average daily gain which influences milk production. Litter size continues to increase every year causing the need for routine reevaluation of nutrient requirements. If dietary inclusion levels are not continuously adjusted this can lead to inadequate daily Lys and energy intake and may negatively impact sow body condition and litter performance. The objective was to characterize the average daily feed intake (ADFI) of sows and define feed intake patterns and their effects on sow body weight, farrowing performance, litter performance, and subsequent farrowing performance. ADFI during lactation was recorded for 4,248 sows from 7 independent research studies. Data collection occurred from November 2021 through November 2023 at a commercial breed-to-wean facility in western Illinois. Each sow was categorized as: consistently low intake (< 5.5 kg/d) throughout the lactation (LLL); low intakes (< 5 kg/d) in the first week, then gradually increased throughout the rest of the lactation period (LHH); gradual increase in intake throughout lactation with no drop and a peak intake after day 10 of lactation (gradual); rapid increase in intake with no drop and the peak intake met before day 10 (rapid); a major drop in feed intake (> 1.6 kg decrease for ≥ 2 d) any time during lactation (MAJOR); minor drop (≤ 1.6 kg for ≥ 2 d; MINOR). Sows were also separated into low (quartile 1; ≤ 25%), average (quartile 2 through 3), or high feed intake (quartile 4; ≥ 75%) by parity (P1, P2, P3+). Sows in the LLL category were younger in parity, had the greatest preweaned mortality, weaned the lightest average pigs, and experienced the greatest loss in body weight percentage compared with sows in all other feed intake categories. Furthermore, sows in the LLL and LHH categories had one fewer subsequent pig born compared with sows in the other four categories. These data support historical findings that feed intake patterns directly contribute to current litter farrowing performance. Lactation intake patterns also influence subsequent farrowing performance. Identifying under-consuming sows that are likely Lys and energy deficient allows producers opportunities to promote consistent, adequate daily intakes to these groups and mitigate negative impacts on sow and litter performance.

Indexed as

Animal FeedEatingLactationAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietFemaleLitter SizePregnancySwinefarrowing performancefeed intakelactationsowsubsequent performance

Identifiers

PMID38558022
PMCPMC11044703
OpenAlexW4393387588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.