ArticlePloS one2024
New strain Brevibacillus laterosporus TSA31-5 produces both brevicidine and brevibacillin, exhibiting distinct antibacterial modes of action against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A MarineMarine drugs · 2026Article
- Biopesticidal Properties of the ProbioticToxins · 2026Article
- Article
- Structural and functional analysis of Escherichia coli membrane disruption by Ib-M peptides.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing prevalence of antibiotic resistance has made it imperative to search for new antimicrobial compounds derived from natural products. In the present study, Brevibacillus laterosporus TSA31-5, isolated from red clay soil, was chosen as the subject for conducting additional antibacterial investigations. The fractions exhibiting the highest antibacterial activity (30% acetonitrile eluent from solid phase extraction) were purified through RP-HPLC. Notably, two compounds (A and B) displayed the most potent antibacterial activity against both Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. ESI-MS/MS spectroscopy and NMR analysis confirmed that compound A corresponds to brevicidine and compound B to brevibacillin. Particularly, brevicidine displayed notable antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of 1-8 μg/mL. On the other hand, brevibacillin exhibited robust antimicrobial effectiveness against both Gram-positive bacterial strains (MIC range of 2-4 μg/mL) and Gram-negative bacteria (MIC range of 4-64 μg/mL). Scanning electron microscopy analysis and fluorescence assays uncovered distinctive morphological alterations in bacterial cell membranes induced by brevicidine and brevibacillin. These observations imply distinct mechanisms of antibacterial activity exhibited by the peptides. Brevicidine exhibited no hemolysis or cytotoxicity up to 512 μg/mL, comparable to the negative control. This suggests its promising therapeutic potential in treating infectious diseases. Conversely, brevibacillin demonstrated elevated cytotoxicity in in vitro assays. Nonetheless, owing to its noteworthy antimicrobial activity against pathogenic bacteria, brevibacillin could still be explored as a promising antimicrobial agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.