ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2026
The effect of upper transabdominal plane block on diaphragm thickness in adult patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation.
Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A hidden ally in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: quadratus lumborum block and the quest for pain-free recovery.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn this prospective and observational study, our objective was to examine the impact of subcostal transversus abdominis plane (SubTAP) block, along with intravenous analgesia techniques, on diaphragm thickness and post-operative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis study examined laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients aged 18-60 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologist score of 1-2. This study divided patients into Group 1 for SubTAP block and Group 2 for intravenous analgesia. This study had 67 patients, at least 30 from each group. Thus, diaphragm thicknesses and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values were compared between regional anaesthesia and intravenous analgesia groups.
resultsPre-operative data showed no statistically significant changes between the groups, although post-extubation inspiratory thickness was closer to baseline in Group 1 patients who received regional block. The groups had different outcomes after extubation and at the post-operative 30 th min ( P = 0.028 and P = 0.001, respectively). There was also a significant difference in post-operative oxygen saturation and VAS scores ( P = 0.001). Our receiver operating characteristic analysis determined that the threshold values for VAS parameters of 2 or 3 were 0.28 cm in inspiration, 0.18 cm in expiration and 1.29 as i/e ratio. Significant discomfort was defined as diaphragm parameter values below these limits.
conclusionsWe found that the earlier return of diaphragmatic functions to baseline was associated with diaphragm thickness. According to the measurements made in the post-operative care unit, the regional block group effectively prevented the loss of diaphragm function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.