ArticlePloS one2024
The effect of coronary stent policies on the risk of percutaneous coronary intervention among acute coronary syndrome patients in Shanghai: Real-world evidence.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to analyze the effect of coronary stent policies implemented in Shanghai on the risk of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) inpatients based on real-world data.
methodsTwo retrospective cohorts of inpatients with a first diagnosis of ACS who had undergone PCI for the first time in the previous year in Shanghai hospitals were examined (one for the postpolicy period and the other for the prepolicy period). χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables between the two cohorts. Single- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) between the two cohorts.
resultsA total of 31,760 ACS patients were included in this study. The proportion of ACS inpatients who had at least one bid-winning stent and 3 or more coronary stents implanted for first-time PCI in the postpolicy cohort was higher than that in the prepolicy cohort (86.52% vs. 55.67% and 6.27% vs. 4.39%, respectively; all p values < 0.0001). The single- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models revealed that the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios for MACEs at 1 year after PCI for the postpolicy cohort relative to the prepolicy cohort were 0.869 (P<0.0001) and 0.814 (P = 0.0007), respectively.
conclusionsThe implementation of coronary stent policies changed coronary stent utilization but had no significant adverse effects on the risk of PCI among ACS patients in Shanghai in the short term. However, the reasons for changes in the number of coronary stents implanted should be analyzed and addressed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.