ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Graphormer supervised de novo protein design method and function validation.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Geometric Deep Learning-Based Drug Design Models for Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.Molecular informatics · 2026Review
- ProtSeqGen: a novel deep learning model for protein sequence design.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Rational protein engineering using an omni-directional multipoint mutagenesis generation pipeline.iScience · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Interplay between Stability and Flexibility in the Design of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Hydrolases.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- A survey of generative AI for de novo drug design: new frontiers in molecule and protein generation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein design is central to nearly all protein engineering problems, as it can enable the creation of proteins with new biological functions, such as improving the catalytic efficiency of enzymes. One key facet of protein design, fixed-backbone protein sequence design, seeks to design new sequences that will conform to a prescribed protein backbone structure. Nonetheless, existing sequence design methods present limitations, such as low sequence diversity and shortcomings in experimental validation of the designed functional proteins. These inadequacies obstruct the goal of functional protein design. To improve these limitations, we initially developed the Graphormer-based Protein Design (GPD) model. This model utilizes the Transformer on a graph-based representation of three-dimensional protein structures and incorporates Gaussian noise and a sequence random masks to node features, thereby enhancing sequence recovery and diversity. The performance of the GPD model was significantly better than that of the state-of-the-art ProteinMPNN model on multiple independent tests, especially for sequence diversity. We employed GPD to design CalB hydrolase and generated nine artificially designed CalB proteins. The results show a 1.7-fold increase in catalytic activity compared to that of the wild-type CalB and strong substrate selectivity on p-nitrophenyl acetate with different carbon chain lengths (C2-C16). Thus, the GPD method could be used for the de novo design of industrial enzymes and protein drugs. The code was released at https://github.com/decodermu/GPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.