ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
SEAOP: a statistical ensemble approach for outlier detection in quantitative proteomics data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- MCOD: a memory-constrained deep learning framework for robust outlier detection in quantitative proteomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- MSstatsQC-ML: A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Monitor System Suitability and Quality Control in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- MFF-AE: Enhanced Quality Control for Proteomics Mass Spectrometry Data via Multi-Scale Feature Fusion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Enhanced Analysis of Low-Abundance Proteins in Soybean Seeds Using Advanced Mass Spectrometry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality control in quantitative proteomics is a persistent challenge, particularly in identifying and managing outliers. Unsupervised learning models, which rely on data structure rather than predefined labels, offer potential solutions. However, without clear labels, their effectiveness might be compromised. Single models are susceptible to the randomness of parameters and initialization, which can result in a high rate of false positives. Ensemble models, on the other hand, have shown capabilities in effectively mitigating the impacts of such randomness and assisting in accurately detecting true outliers. Therefore, we introduced SEAOP, a Python toolbox that utilizes an ensemble mechanism by integrating multi-round data management and a statistics-based decision pipeline with multiple models. Specifically, SEAOP uses multi-round resampling to create diverse sub-data spaces and employs outlier detection methods to identify candidate outliers in each space. Candidates are then aggregated as confirmed outliers via a chi-square test, adhering to a 95% confidence level, to ensure the precision of the unsupervised approaches. Additionally, SEAOP introduces a visualization strategy, specifically designed to intuitively and effectively display the distribution of both outlier and non-outlier samples. Optimal hyperparameter models of SEAOP for outlier detection were identified by using a gradient-simulated standard dataset and Mann-Kendall trend test. The performance of the SEAOP toolbox was evaluated using three experimental datasets, confirming its reliability and accuracy in handling quantitative proteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.