Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38557665›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2024

Building evidence to advance health equity: a systematic review on care-related outcomes for older, minoritised populations in long-term care homes.

Mary M Scott, Alixe Ménard, Annie H Sun, Maya Murmann, Amy Ramzy, Prabasha Rasaputra, Michelle Fleming, Zsófia Orosz, Chau Huynh, Vivian Welch and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mary M ScottThe Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1745-0820
Alixe MénardThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Annie H SunBruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Maya MurmannThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Amy RamzyBruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Prabasha RasaputraBruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Michelle FlemingBruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Zsófia OroszBruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Chau HuynhBruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Vivian WelchBruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Anna Cooper-ReedBruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Amy T HsuThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2747-4121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvancing health equity requires more contextualised evidence.

objectivesTo synthesise published evidence using an existing framework on the origins of health disparities and determine care-related outcome disparities for residents of long-term care, comparing minoritised populations to the context-specific dominant population.

designSystematic review. SUBJECTS: Residents of 24-hour long-term care homes.

methodsThe protocol was registered a priori with PROSPERO (CRD42021269489). Literature published between 1 January 2000 and 26 September 2021, was searched, including studies comparing baseline characteristics and outcomes in minoritised versus dominant populations. Dual screening, two-reviewer verification for extraction, and risk of bias assessments were conducted to ensure rigour. Studies were synthesized using a conceptual framework to contextualise evidence according to multi-level factors contributing to the development of care disparities.

resultsTwenty-one of 34 included studies demonstrated disparities in care outcomes for minoritised groups compared to majority groups. Thirty-one studies observed differences in individual-level characteristics (e.g. age, education, underlying conditions) upon entry to homes, with several outcome disparities (e.g. restraint use, number of medications) present at baseline and remaining or worsening over time. Significant gaps in evidence were identified, particularly an absence of literature on provider information and evidence on the experience of intersecting minority identities that contribute to care-related outcome disparities in long-term care.

conclusionThis review found differences in minoritised populations' care-related outcomes. The findings provide guidance for future health equity policy and research-supporting diverse and intersectional capacity building in long-term care.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth EquityHomes for the AgedLong-Term CareNursing HomesAgedFemaleHumansMaleaccessand evaluationhealthcare disparitieshealth care qualitylong-term careminority healthnursing homesolder peoplesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38557665
PMCPMC10982852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.