ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2024
Tracking Tidal Volume From Holter and Wearable Armband Electrocardiogram Monitoring.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiological Monitoring Applications of Wearable Multimodal Fusion Systems Based on ECG and PPG: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A chamber study of respiratory and autonomic responses to hydrotreated vegetable oil exhaust using ECG-derived respiration.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Engineering Triboelectric Paper for Energy Harvesting and Smart Sensing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A novel method for tracking the tidal volume (TV) from electrocardiogram (ECG) is presented. The method is based on the amplitude of ECG-derived respiration (EDR) signals. Three different morphology-based EDR signals and three different amplitude estimation methods have been studied, leading to a total of 9 amplitude-EDR (AEDR) signals per ECG channel. The potential of these AEDR signals to track the changes in TV was analyzed. These methods do not need a calibration process. In addition, a personalized-calibration approach for TV estimation is proposed, based on a linear model that uses all AEDR signals from a device. All methods have been validated with two different ECG devices: a commercial Holter monitor, and a custom-made wearable armband. The lowest errors for the personalized-calibration methods, compared to a reference TV, were -3.48% [-17.41% / 12.93%] (median [first quartile / third quartile]) for the Holter monitor, and 0.28% [-10.90% / 17.15%] for the armband. On the other hand, medians of correlations to the reference TV were higher than 0.8 for uncalibrated methods, while they were higher than 0.9 for personal-calibrated methods. These results suggest that TV changes can be tracked from ECG using either a conventional (Holter) setup, or our custom-made wearable armband. These results also suggest that the methods are not as reliable in applications that induce small changes in TV, but they can be potentially useful for detecting large changes in TV, such as sleep apnea/hypopnea and/or exacerbations of a chronic respiratory disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.