Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38557578›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Implementation and effectiveness outcomes of Community Health Advocacy Teams to improve long-lasting insecticide net distribution and use in six districts in Ghana: A one-group pre-post-test study.

Franklin N Glozah, Philip Teg-Nefaah Tabong, Eva Bazant, Emmanuel Asampong, Ruby Hornuvo, Adanna Nwameme, Nana Yaw Peprah, Gloria M Chandi, Philip Baba Adongo, Phyllis Dako-Gyeke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Franklin N GlozahDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4178-963X
Philip Teg-Nefaah TabongDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6457-1844
Eva BazantHealth Campaign Effectiveness Coalition, Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-8410
Emmanuel AsampongDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Ruby HornuvoDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7380-696X
Adanna NwamemeDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Nana Yaw PeprahNational Malaria Elimination Programme, Accra, Ghana.
Gloria M ChandiGhana Health Service, Ga North Municipal Health Directorate, Greater Accra, Ghana.
Philip Baba AdongoDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Phyllis Dako-GyekeDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-001076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria remains a leading cause of illness and death especially among children and pregnant women in Ghana. Despite the efforts made by the National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP), including distribution of Long-Lasting Insecticide Nets (LLINs) to households through periodic Point Mass Distribution (PMD) campaigns and continuous channels (antenatal, schools and postnatal), there is a gap between access and use of LLINs in Ghana. An effective and functional community-based group that would seek to improve the effectiveness of LLIN distribution before, during, after PMD Campaigns and continuous distribution at the community level could help address this gap. This paper assesses the implementation outcomes and short-term effectiveness of the pilot implementation of co-created community health advocacy teams (CHAT) intervention in Ghanaian communities to plan and implement campaigns to increase LLIN use. The study employed a one-group pre-post study design and measured implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility) and effectiveness outcomes (LLIN awareness, LLIN access, willingness to purchase LLIN, and LLIN use) among 800 community households. The CHAT intervention was implemented for four months across six districts in the Eastern and Volta regions of Ghana. The data were downloaded directly from REDCap and analyzed statistically (descriptive and McNemar test of association) using SPSS 22 software. After the implementation period, the majority of respondents in all six districts indicated that the CHAT intervention was acceptable (89.8%), appropriate (89.5%), and feasible (90%). Also, there was a significant association between baseline and end-line assessment on all four effectiveness outcome measures. Household members' awareness of, access to, willingness to purchase, and use of LLINs increased significantly over the four-month period that the CHAT intervention was implemented. The study concludes that CHAT is an acceptable, appropriate, and feasible intervention for supporting the National Malaria Programme in LLIN PMD and for engaging in Social and Behaviour Change Communication activities through the continuous channels of distribution. Additionally, the CHAT demonstrates short-term effectiveness outcomes in terms of creating LLIN awareness, providing access to LLIN, and encouraging Ghanaian community members to be willing to purchase and use LLINs. Although the activities of CHAT members were largely voluntary, integration into the existing primary health care system will make it sustainable.

Identifiers

PMID38557578
PMCPMC10984411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.