Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38557315›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Investigating the Impact of AI on Shared Decision-Making in Post-Kidney Transplant Care (PRIMA-AI): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Bilgin Osmanodja, Zeineb Sassi, Sascha Eickmann, Carla Maria Hansen, Roland Roller, Aljoscha Burchardt, David Samhammer, Peter Dabrock, Sebastian Möller, Klemens Budde and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06056518 (Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Impact of AI on Shared Decision Making in Post-kidney Transplant Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06056518 nacompletednot on this map

Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Impact of AI on Shared Decision Making in Post-kidney Transplant Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled76ConditionsKidney Transplant FailureArmsAI-based risk prediction for kidney graft loss
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Decisional preferences and distress among kidney transplant recipients with impaired graft function.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bilgin OsmanodjaDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8660-0722
Zeineb SassiDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9720-9528
Sascha EickmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0651-7399
Carla Maria HansenDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6180-506X
Roland RollerGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7900-4116
Aljoscha BurchardtGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5117-5965
David SamhammerInstitute for Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3111-9525
Peter DabrockInstitute for Systematic Theology II (Ethics), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6928-9912
Sebastian MöllerGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3057-0760
Klemens BuddeDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7929-5942
Anne HerrmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-4176
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGerman Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients after kidney transplantation eventually face the risk of graft loss with the concomitant need for dialysis or retransplantation. Choosing the right kidney replacement therapy after graft loss is an important preference-sensitive decision for kidney transplant recipients. However, the rate of conversations about treatment options after kidney graft loss has been shown to be as low as 13% in previous studies. It is unknown whether the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI)-based risk prediction models can increase the number of conversations about treatment options after graft loss and how this might influence the associated shared decision-making (SDM).

objectiveThis study aims to explore the impact of AI-based risk prediction for the risk of graft loss on the frequency of conversations about the treatment options after graft loss, as well as the associated SDM process.

methodsThis is a 2-year, prospective, randomized, 2-armed, parallel-group, single-center trial in a German kidney transplant center. All patients will receive the same routine post-kidney transplant care that usually includes follow-up visits every 3 months at the kidney transplant center. For patients in the intervention arm, physicians will be assisted by a validated and previously published AI-based risk prediction system that estimates the risk for graft loss in the next year, starting from 3 months after randomization until 24 months after randomization. The study population will consist of 122 kidney transplant recipients >12 months after transplantation, who are at least 18 years of age, are able to communicate in German, and have an estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m

resultsThe enrollment for the study is ongoing. The first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2025.

conclusionsThis is the first study to examine the influence of AI-based risk prediction on physician-patient interaction in the context of kidney transplantation. We use a mixed methods approach by combining a randomized design with a simple quantitative end point (frequency of conversations), different quantitative measurements for SDM, and several qualitative research methods (eg, records of physician-patient conversations and semistructured interviews) to examine the implementation of AI-based risk prediction in the clinic.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06056518; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06056518. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/54857.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligencedecision-support systemDSSkidney transplantationqualitative researchSDMshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID38557315
PMCPMC11019425
OpenAlexW4393386969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.