ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2024
Evaluating mFARS in pediatric Friedreich's ataxia: Insights from the FACHILD study.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disease Progression in Children With Friedreich Ataxia: Functional Performance and Other Outcome Assessments in the FACHILD Study.Journal of child neurology · 2026Article
- Domain Specific Placebo Response in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Peripheral frataxin levels govern long-term clinical progression in Friedreich ataxia.BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
- Early experience on omaveloxolone in adult patients with Friedreich's ataxia: a real-world observational study.Journal of neurology · 2025Observational
- Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Friedreich Ataxia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the TRACK-FA Study.Annals of neurology · 2025Observational
- Characteristics of Adverse Events and Clinical Risks of Omaveloxolone Based on FAERS Data.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- A global perspective on research advances and future challenges in Friedreich ataxia.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesFriedreich ataxia (FRDA) is a rare genetic disorder caused by mutations in the FXN gene, leading to progressive coordination loss and other symptoms. The recently approved omaveloxolone targets this condition but is limited to patients over 16 years of age, highlighting the need for pediatric treatments due to the disorder's early onset and more rapid progression in children. This population also experiences increased non-neurological complications; the FACHILD study aimed to augment and expand the knowledge about the natural history of the disease and clinical outcome assessments for trials in children in FRDA.
methodsThe study enrolled 108 individuals aged 7-18 years with a confirmed FRDA diagnosis, with visits occurring from October 2017 to November 2022 across three institutions. Several measures were introduced to minimize the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including virtual visits. Outcome measures centered on the mFARS score and its subscores, and data were analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures. For context and to avoid misinterpretation, the analysis was augmented with data from patients enrolled in the Friedreich's Ataxia Clinical Outcome Measures Study.
resultsResults confirmed the general usefulness of the mFARS score in children, but also highlighted issues, particularly with the upper limb subscore (FARS B). Increased variability, limited homogeneity across study subgroups, and potential training effects might limit mFARS application in clinical trials in pediatric populations.
interpretationThe FARS E (Upright Stability) score might be a preferred outcome measure in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.