ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2024
Collision of herbal medicine and nanotechnology: a bibliometric analysis of herbal nanoparticles from 2004 to 2023.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- From nutritional intervention to immune modulation: a multi-database bibliometric and topic modeling study of vitamin D in inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Bibliometric and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) analysis of artificial intelligence for thyroid nodules.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Nanoparticles in influenza research: a bibliometric analysis of global trends (2005 - 2025).Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping the knowledge domain: a bibliometric analysis of global research on traditional Chinese medicine for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (2000-2024).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Applying transformer-based deep learning models in image-driven cancer diagnosis: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research trends.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pharmacoepidemiologic Research Based on Common Data Models: Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Gut‑liver‑kidney axis: A systems biology framework for understanding and treating chronic kidney disease (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Natural Products for Hyperuricemia: A Bibliometric Analysis (2004-2026).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Landscape and evolutionary trends of nanotechnology in cancer radiosensitization.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Research status and trends of Piezo1 and brain: A bibliometric analysis.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in periodontal disease research: a bibliometric and visualized analysis of global research trends (2007-2025).The Saudi dental journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Global trends and thematic evolution of nursing in liver cancer: a bibliometric analysis of the web of science core collection (1944-2025).Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Self-assembly of plant-derived bioactive nanostructures in traditional Chinese medicine.iScience · 2026Review
- Inhalable herbal nanotherapeutics targeting lung carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Plant-Based Nano-Delivery Systems in the Treatment of Inflammatory Disorders.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Artemisia-derived carbon dots with excellent pharmacological activities and ROS scavenging for osteoarthritis treatment.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Emerging nanotechnological strategies for delivering bioactive components from botanical drugs and traditional Chinese medicine in atherosclerosis therapy: from formulation to mechanism.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Carbon dots derived fromFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHerbal nanoparticles are made from natural herbs/medicinal plants, their extracts, or a combination with other nanoparticle carriers. Compared to traditional herbs, herbal nanoparticles lead to improved bioavailability, enhanced stability, and reduced toxicity. Previous research indicates that herbal medicine nanomaterials are rapidly advancing and making significant progress; however, bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping for herbal nanoparticles are currently lacking. We performed a bibliometric analysis by retrieving publications related to herbal nanoparticles from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database spanning from 2004 to 2023. Data processing was performed using the R package Bibliometrix, VOSviewers, and CiteSpace.
resultsIn total, 1876 articles related to herbal nanoparticles were identified, originating from various countries, with China being the primary contributing country. The number of publications in this field increases annually. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and Saveetha University in India are prominent research institutions in this domain. The Journal "International Journal of Nanomedicine" has the highest number of publications. The number of authors of these publications reached 8234, with Yan Zhao, Yue Zhang, and Huihua Qu being the most prolific authors and Yan Zhao being the most frequently cited author. "Traditional Chinese medicine," "drug delivery," and "green synthesis" are the main research focal points. Themes such as "green synthesis," "curcumin," "wound healing," "drug delivery," and "carbon dots" may represent emerging research areas.
conclusionsOur study findings assist in identifying the latest research frontiers and hot topics, providing valuable references for scholars investigating the role of nanotechnology in herbal medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.