Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38556857›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2024

Collision of herbal medicine and nanotechnology: a bibliometric analysis of herbal nanoparticles from 2004 to 2023.

Sinan Ai, Yake Li, Huijuan Zheng, Meiling Zhang, Jiayin Tao, Weijing Liu, Liang Peng, Zhen Wang, Yaoxian Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Carbon dots derived fromFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sinan Ai *China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yake Li *Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Huijuan ZhengDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Meiling ZhangBeijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jiayin TaoDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Weijing LiuDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Liang PengChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China. pengliang8028@163.com.
Zhen WangDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China. zhenwangdzm@126.com.
Yaoxian WangHenan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. wyx3203@sina.com.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation of China 7222160Beijing Research Ward Construction Clinical Research 2022-YJXBF-04-02National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2023-NHLHCRF-DJZD-01National Natural Science Foundation of China 82004272National Natural Science Foundation of China 82170817National Natural Science Foundation of China 82174342National Natural Science Foundation of China 82274460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHerbal nanoparticles are made from natural herbs/medicinal plants, their extracts, or a combination with other nanoparticle carriers. Compared to traditional herbs, herbal nanoparticles lead to improved bioavailability, enhanced stability, and reduced toxicity. Previous research indicates that herbal medicine nanomaterials are rapidly advancing and making significant progress; however, bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping for herbal nanoparticles are currently lacking. We performed a bibliometric analysis by retrieving publications related to herbal nanoparticles from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database spanning from 2004 to 2023. Data processing was performed using the R package Bibliometrix, VOSviewers, and CiteSpace.

resultsIn total, 1876 articles related to herbal nanoparticles were identified, originating from various countries, with China being the primary contributing country. The number of publications in this field increases annually. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and Saveetha University in India are prominent research institutions in this domain. The Journal "International Journal of Nanomedicine" has the highest number of publications. The number of authors of these publications reached 8234, with Yan Zhao, Yue Zhang, and Huihua Qu being the most prolific authors and Yan Zhao being the most frequently cited author. "Traditional Chinese medicine," "drug delivery," and "green synthesis" are the main research focal points. Themes such as "green synthesis," "curcumin," "wound healing," "drug delivery," and "carbon dots" may represent emerging research areas.

conclusionsOur study findings assist in identifying the latest research frontiers and hot topics, providing valuable references for scholars investigating the role of nanotechnology in herbal medicine.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesPlants, MedicinalBibliometricsChinaHumansPlant ExtractsPlant ExtractsBibliometric analysisCitespaceHerbal medicineHerbal nanoparticlesNanoparticlesTraditional Chinese medicineVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID38556857
PMCPMC10983666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.