ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024
Novel motivational interviewing-based intervention improves engagement in physical activity and readiness to change among adolescents with chronic pain.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ready or Not? Applying the Transtheoretical Model of Change on Return-to-Work Following CBT for Chronic Low Back Pain.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Attrition From Pediatric Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: Utilizing the "Paediatric Electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration (PaedePPOC) Database".The Clinical journal of pain · 2025Article
- Novel motivational interviewing-based intervention improves engagement in physical activity and readiness to change among adolescents with chronic pain.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEngaging adolescents with chronic pain in physical activities is challenging. Motivational interviewing (MI) combined with activity promotion may encourage teens to make behavioural changes. This research aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of our MI-based physical activity promotion programme, the M3 training.
methodsIn our exploratory study with 35 adolescent-parent dyads, we evaluated the feasibility by enrolment, drop-out and retention rates. Acceptability of the M3 training was examined by adherence rates and participation experiences through open-ended questions. We also assessed changes in pain self-efficacy and readiness to change after the M3 training intervention.
resultsThe M3 training was feasible with an adequate enrolment (77.8%) and retention (85.7%) rate. Both teens and parents found the M3 training acceptable and considered exercise and physical activity the most helpful elements of the programme (36% and 37%, respectively). While self-efficacy remained unchanged, we identified a significant increase in the readiness to change for adolescents and parents.
conclusionM3 training improved physical activity engagement while prioritising adolescents' autonomy. Furthermore, it appears to be a clinically relevant approach and could result in a positive shift in readiness to change within a shorter timeframe. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The preliminary version of the M3 training was reviewed and commented upon by the public (adolescents and adults). Adolescents who participated in this study were designing their own movement programme, considering their lived experiences. Participants' feedback was used to create the online version of the M3 training (which will be published elsewhere).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.