ArticleJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography2024
Echocardiographic Detection of Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities Using Artificial Intelligence Compared to Human Readers.
Article in Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-augmented cardiopulmonary point-of-care ultrasound: a narrative review for pulmonary and critical care clinicians.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Special article-EchoPeer: a standardized framework for assessing echocardiography reports in the era of artificial intelligence: a recommendation from the Korean Society of Echocardiography AI and Future Strategy Committee.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Deep Learning for Cardiac Wall Motion Analysis: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and Clinical Applications.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced echocardiography in cardiovascular disease management.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- A Multimodular AI Algorithm for Automated Assessment of Left Ventricular Function in Ischemic Heart Disease: Ejection Fraction, Wall Motion, and Regional Myocardial Segmentation.Balkan medical journal · 2026Article
- Clinical obstacles to machine-learning POCUS adoption and system-wide AI implementation (The COMPASS-AI survey).The ultrasound journal · 2025Article
- AI assisted focused cardiac ultrasound in preventive cardiology - a perspective.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- How To Perform Comprehensive Transthoracic Echocardiography?Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2025Article
- Review
- Future Horizons: The Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Current Applications and New Horizons.Journal of cardiovascular echographyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) detection is foundational to transthoracic echocardiography, current methods are prone to interobserver variability. We aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) model for RWMA assessment and compare it to expert and novice readers.
methodsWe used 15,746 transthoracic echocardiography studies-including 25,529 apical videos-which were split into training, validation, and test datasets. A convolutional neural network was trained and validated using apical 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber videos to predict the presence of RWMA in 7 regions defined by coronary perfusion territories, using the ground truth derived from clinical transthoracic echocardiography reports. Within the test cohort, DL model accuracy was compared to 6 expert and 3 novice readers using F1 score evaluation, with the ground truth of RWMA defined by expert readers. Significance between the DL model and novices was assessed using the permutation test.
resultsWithin the test cohort, the DL model accurately identified any RWMA with an area under the curve of 0.96 (0.92-0.98). The mean F1 scores of the experts and the DL model were numerically similar for 6 of 7 regions: anterior (86 vs 84), anterolateral (80 vs 74), inferolateral (83 vs 87), inferoseptal (86 vs 86), apical (88 vs 87), inferior (79 vs 81), and any RWMA (90 vs 94), respectively, while in the anteroseptal region, the F1 score of the DL model was lower than the experts (75 vs 89). Using F1 scores, the DL model outperformed both novices 1 (P = .002) and 2 (P = .02) for the detection of any RWMA.
conclusionsDeep learning provides accurate detection of RWMA, which was comparable to experts and outperformed a majority of novices. Deep learning may improve the efficiency of RWMA assessment and serve as a teaching tool for novices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.