Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38555676›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2024

An initial test of the contrast avoidance model in bipolar spectrum disorders.

Hanjoo Kim, Melvin G McInnis, Sarah H Sperry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanjoo KimHeinz C. Prechter Bipolar Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Michigan, Michigan, USA. Electronic address: hanjokim@med.umich.edu.
Melvin G McInnisHeinz C. Prechter Bipolar Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Michigan, Michigan, USA.
Sarah H SperryHeinz C. Prechter Bipolar Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Michigan, Michigan, USA; Department of Psychology, The University of Michigan, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Affective and Cognitive Mechanisms of Emotion-Based Impulsivity in Bipolar Disorder: Linking Neural Oscillatory Dynamics to Real-World OutcomesK23MH131601 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sarah Havens Sperry · 2023 to 2026
$779k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH131601NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH127613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Contrast Avoidance Model suggests that individuals sensitive to negative emotional shifts use prior increases in negative affect to prevent further escalation in response to adverse situations, while the heightened negative affect amplifies positive emotional contrasts when encountering unexpected positive events. Individuals with bipolar spectrum disorders (BSDs), characterized by shifts between (hypo)manic and depressive episodes, may undergo more salient emotional contrasts. Drawing from the Contrast Avoidance Model, the shifts from depression to (hypo)mania can be conceptualized as positive emotional contrasts, potentially heightening the perceived pleasure during (hypo)manic episodes. On the other hand, the shifts from (hypo)manic to depressive episodes can be viewed as negative emotional contrasts, contributing to the challenges associated with depressive states. Despite the intriguing potential of this interplay, the link between the Contrast Avoidance Model and BSDs has never been empirically tested. Our study addressed this gap by examining group differences in contrast avoidance traits between individuals with BSDs, unipolar depression, and healthy controls in a large cohort study (N = 536). Results indicated that individuals with BSDs exhibited significantly higher scores in the total, and Discomfort with Negative Emotional Shifts and Avoidance of Negative Emotional Contrasts/Enhancement of Positive Emotional Contrasts factors, as well as separate item scores on the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaire-General Emotion (CAQ-GE), compared to those with unipolar depression and healthy controls. Although marginal, the BD II subtype demonstrated a stronger inclination to avoid negative emotional contrasts compared to BD I. These findings suggest that contrast avoidance may be a psychological mechanism implicated in BSDs.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderDepressive DisorderCohort StudiesEmotionsHumansManiaAffective labilityBipolar disorderContrast avoidance modelDepressionEmotion regulationMood instability

Identifiers

PMID38555676
PMCPMC11134284
OpenAlexW4393067283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.