Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38555473›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Benchmarking digital PCR partition classification methods with empirical and simulated duplex data.

Yao Chen, Ward De Spiegelaere, Wim Trypsteen, David Gleerup, Jo Vandesompele, Antoon Lievens, Matthijs Vynck, Olivier Thas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yao ChenDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Belgium.
Ward De SpiegelaereDepartment of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Ghent University, Belgium.
Wim TrypsteenDepartment of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Ghent University, Belgium.
David GleerupDepartment of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Ghent University, Belgium.
Jo VandesompeleGhent University Digital PCR Consortium, Ghent University, Belgium.
Antoon LievensGhent University Digital PCR Consortium, Ghent University, Belgium.
Matthijs VynckDepartment of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Ghent University, Belgium.
Olivier ThasDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital PCR (dPCR) is a highly accurate technique for the quantification of target nucleic acid(s). It has shown great potential in clinical applications, like tumor liquid biopsy and validation of biomarkers. Accurate classification of partitions based on end-point fluorescence intensities is crucial to avoid biased estimators of the concentration of the target molecules. We have evaluated many clustering methods, from general-purpose methods to specific methods for dPCR and flowcytometry, on both simulated and real-life data. Clustering method performance was evaluated by simulating various scenarios. Based on our extensive comparison of clustering methods, we describe the limits of these methods, and formulate guidelines for choosing an appropriate method. In addition, we have developed a novel method for simulating realistic dPCR data. The method is based on a mixture distribution of a Poisson point process and a skew-$t$ distribution, which enables the generation of irregularities of cluster shapes and randomness of partitions between clusters ('rain') as commonly observed in dPCR data. Users can fine-tune the model parameters and generate labeled datasets, using their own data as a template. Besides, the database of experimental dPCR data augmented with the labeled simulated data can serve as training and testing data for new clustering methods. The simulation method is available as an R Shiny app.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNucleic AcidsBenchmarkingHumansLiquid BiopsyPolymerase Chain ReactionNucleic Acidsabsolute quantificationclusteringdigital PCRhigh-precision PCRmolecular diagnosticsnucleic acid amplificationnucleic acid quantificationsimulation

Identifiers

PMID38555473
PMCPMC10981767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.