Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38555360›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

From wires to waves, a novel sensor system for in vivo pressure monitoring.

Daniel Nilsen Wright, Mark Züchner, Eis Annavini, Manuel J Escalona, Lena Hammerlund Teige, Lars Geir Whist Tvedt, Andreas Lervik, Henning A Haga, Thomas Guiho, Ingelin Clausen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Nilsen Wright *Department of Microsystems and Nanotechnology, SINTEF AS, Oslo, Norway.
Mark Züchner *Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eis AnnaviniDivision of Physiology, Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 9, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
Manuel J EscalonaDivision of Physiology, Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 9, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
Lena Hammerlund TeigeDivision of Physiology, Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 9, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
Lars Geir Whist TvedtDepartment of Microsystems and Nanotechnology, SINTEF AS, Oslo, Norway.
Andreas LervikDepartment of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Henning A HagaDepartment of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Thomas GuihoCAMIN team, INRIA, Montpellier, France.
Ingelin ClausenDepartment of Microsystems and Nanotechnology, SINTEF AS, Oslo, Norway.
Thomas GlottSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway.
Jean-Luc BoullandDivision of Physiology, Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 9, 0317, Oslo, Norway. j.l.boulland@medisin.uio.no.
University of Oslo · NOSINTEF · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOInstitut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique · FROslo University Hospital · NOSunnaas sykehus · NO

Funding

Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2019078Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2020033Norges Forskningsråd 248001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pressure monitoring in various organs of the body is essential for appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. In almost all situations, monitoring is performed in a hospital setting. Technological advances not only promise to improve clinical pressure monitoring systems, but also engage toward the development of fully implantable systems in ambulatory patients. Such systems would not only provide longitudinal time monitoring to healthcare personnel, but also to the patient who could adjust their way-of-life in response to the measurements. In the past years, we have developed a new type of piezoresistive pressure sensor system. Different bench tests have demonstrated that it delivers precise and reliable pressure measurements in real-time. The potential of this system was confirmed by a continuous recording in a patient that lasted for almost a day. In the present study, we further characterized the functionality of this sensor system by conducting in vivo implantation experiments in nine female farm pigs. To get a step closer to a fully implantable system, we also adapted two different wireless communication solutions to the sensor system. The communication protocols are based on MICS (Medical Implant Communication System) and BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) communication. As a proof-of-concept, implantation experiments in nine female pigs demonstrated the functionality of both systems, with a notable technical superiority of the BLE.

Indexed as

ComputersProstheses and ImplantsAnimalsFemaleHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicSwineBluetoothImplantMEMSMICSPiezoresistive pressure sensorPig modelWireless

Identifiers

PMID38555360
PMCPMC10981663
OpenAlexW4393334684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.